Run 10946 LASER CALIBRATION SM 1,2 LOWER
Run 10951 LASER CALIBRATION SM 1,2 ATTICO
Second things about the calibrations runs.
1)Run 10903 all seem to be ok.
2)Run 10904 problem : looking at LGB the run is bad flagged as Normal.
But if you try to looking at the data ( I had used the file that is generated
at the end of run by an Eric's program and that you can find on
vxmacb::$1$dia2:[SCRA.KATS.MON.STAT]) the SPU seem to receive the signal from
the reference PMT
> LASER AT 3900 6855.5 (Counts/Rates (per hour))
> LASER 3900 6855.5 (Counts/Rates (per hour))
And the fake box receiced the signal too:
>++++ ERP MUON AND GC STATISTICS (Counts/Rates (per hour)) : +++++++++++++++++++
> --lines: 1st=MUON HITS, 2nd=MUON RATES, 3rd=GC HITS, 4th=GC RATES--------------
>
> 5W08 5W09 5W10 5W11 5W12 5W13 5W14 5ATL 5E08 5E09 5E10 5E11 5E12 5E13 5E14 5T17
> -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
> -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8
> -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
> -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8
> 5T01 5T02 5T03 5T04 5T05 5T06 5T07 5T08 5T09 5T10 5T11 5T12 5T13 5T14 5T15 5T16
> -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
> -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8
> -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
> -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8
The 5ATL is the fake box for both LED system and attico; negative values
suggest that the numbers of counts was greater than 9999 *or* that the rate was
greater than 999.9
So seems that the problem it is not a hardware problem but is due to the
method in which LGB determined the costant "Run type". It is possible to
check how LGB works?
3)I had received, after the september 7's calibrations the following
message
Ciao,
> There was no .cal file produced from the calibration runs
>10858 and 10860 that I can find. (These are produced automatically
>by bmon and are put in $1$dia2:[scra.erp.calib] until I can copy
>them to Indiana to process in making calibration constants.) This
>suggests that there was some problem with the calibration signal
>getting to the fake box or the ref adc. There were files made the
>week before so perhaps something is unplugged or plugged into the
>wrong thing?
> Alice Hawthorne
Could it be the same problem?
I found that in the last three weeks we had always the same problem :
All the laser calibration runs for the lower part of the apparatus are
well recognized from LGB like calibration runs ( 10862, 10903, 10946 ),
Both laser attico and LED/TDC calibration are bad labeled from LGB like
Normal run (10858,10860,10904,10906,10945,10951).