Burst from 10015

RICH BAKER (baker@umalp1.physics.lsa.umich.edu)
Fri, 19 May 1995 19:15:05 EDT

Sorry to take so long to respond, but I've been adding some new stuff to
my analysis code to keep track of the hits that get tossed out, so I can
compare my burst search to Kate's.

Hit # Box Time Energy Cut
1 339 0.0 42.49 Trigger (coincidence with some other
muon trigger. Bari, CSPAM)
2 165 0.8 10.05 ABS(TDCZ-ADCZ)>200 (276 vs. 54)

3 261 0.9 10.96 Bad TDCZ (-3928), could be calib. const.

4 371 1.2 10.34 *******

5 479 1.6 13.11 *******

6 370 2.0 11.19 kept

7 212 2.9 12.52 Bad TDCZ (-2691)

8 256 3.0 15.38 My calib const give Energy = 7.3

9 240 6.0 11.33 kept

10 444 7.9 11.01 ********

11 368 8.2 42.64 kept

12 365 9.6 11.42 TDCZ (-3510)

Notes: The good thing to note is that one of the two 40+ MeV events is
indeed a Muon since there was a time coincidence with one of the muon
triggers other than the ERP. Hit #11 is probably also a muon, but it
triggered nothing else in the detector. The three hits I marked with
******** are not reported in my analysis either because they are not
single box hits, or because the energy reconstructed below 6 MeV. I
suspect that they are low energy hits associated with other ERP hits
on adjacent supermodules. It could be the calibration constants though.
I'm using the VAXGS::DISK$MACRO:[MACROCAL.DB] version of the calibration
constants. The three events I show bad TDCZ for I will have to look into
since Kate seems to get good positions for these hits.

Rich