Re: annoying boxes

Alec Habig (ahabig@rsgs02.LNGS.INFN.IT)
Sun, 8 Dec 1996 11:30:30 +0100 (MET)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alec Habig: "uVAX#2 out for gainsetting"
Previous message: Kate Scholberg: "Re: annoying boxes"
In reply to: Kate Scholberg: "Re: annoying boxes"

Kate Scholberg writes :
> Here is what I propose: we use current calibs for now, turning off any
> boxes (e.g. 134) which are really wild (easy to do in the database on
> VXMACB by setting the gains to zero, and has been done in the past for
> egregious boxes).

Turns out that box 134 got corrected yesterday by a simple LUT iteration. The
gain was unbalanced. It now looks OK in terms of rates.

-- 
       Alec Habig, Boston University Particle Astrophysics Group
			   habig@budoe.bu.edu
	       http://www.astro.indiana.edu/home/ahabig/

Next message: Alec Habig: "uVAX#2 out for gainsetting"
Previous message: Kate Scholberg: "Re: annoying boxes"
In reply to: Kate Scholberg: "Re: annoying boxes"