Latest Burstlet

RICH BAKER (baker@umalp1.physics.lsa.umich.edu)
Sun, 07 Jan 1996 18:05:47 EDT

Well, here's my traditional post-run analysis on the latest burstlet
candidate. For once, NONE of the monitor hits are rejected by my analysis.
However, only one of the hits reconstructs with anything close to the
energy reported by the monitor. In particular, the hit in box 320 is only
6.9 MeV compared to 45 MeV! I've looked at energy distributions for these
boxes using my calibration constants, and I see nothing unusual. Perhaps
someone can check on what is causing the CALMOD constants to give such a
high energy.

Rich
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 59 329 0.0000 10.64 -284.77 0
HIT NO. BOX TIME ENERGY POSITION CUT
1 329 0.000000 10.36 -266.27
10.35 -317.71 *Kept*
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 64 358 0.8597 10.87 12.77 0
HIT NO. BOX TIME ENERGY POSITION CUT
14 358 0.859712 8.80 9.18
8.79 38.21 *Kept*
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 65 322 0.8664 13.00 -532.76 0
HIT NO. BOX TIME ENERGY POSITION CUT
15 322 0.866432 9.19 -578.44
8.76 -536.07 *Kept*
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
17 75 320 2.6094 45.07 -487.49 0
HIT NO. BOX TIME ENERGY POSITION CUT
49 320 2.609449 6.91 -546.00
6.33 -551.36 *Kept*
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
18 76 339 2.9955 13.51 -549.39 8
HIT NO. BOX TIME ENERGY POSITION CUT
55 339 2.995489 4.21 -564.87
6.40 -544.32 Energy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------