In going through the current user_procedure.pas I noticed a
small problem:
234: {uV2 csp34...call with sm=1 or 7}
begin
cspam_BC(wptr0,cdat[0],0); {3BC}
cspam_BC(wptr1,cdat[0],2); {4BC}
cspam_WE(wptr0,cdat[1],0); {3WE}
cspam_WE(wptr1,cdat[1],2); {4WE
cspam_T(wptr0,cdat[2],0); {3T}
cspam_T(wptr1,cdat[2],2); {4T}
end;
CSPAM/FMT/HIP fans will recognize this as the portion of the
case statement that decodes equip30 for wfd readout. The problem is an
unterminated comment around "4WE" which I believe will cause the top
face on SM3 to never read out the WFD for the MVAX1and2 trigger case.
This should be fixed ASAP. (My apologies to Ash for not noticing this
BEFORE he rebuilt the system for monopole calibration readout)
I also wanted a confirmation of the behavior of SELREG
SELREG 2,7,15,0,0
SECT 1
WFD_PATREG 1,30,112
SECT 11
WFD_PATREG 2,30,123
EOS
will the above piece of camac list execute BOTH sections if BOTH bits 1
and 11 are set? This seems perfectly reasonable, and it should be this
way. I was wondering if in practice people have definitely seen SELREG
behave this way. Multiple sections in a SELREG block are currently used
nowhere except in equipment 30.
-Chris ORTH