In a nutshell,
here's what I was going to propose: (quite consistent with your suggestion)
- The "working group" can consist of several individuals from each
collaboration. These people decide technical issues, do the actual
work on the code, and act as liasons to their collaborations.
Currently, the working group is all the people on the mailing list.
- Since the working group is getting fairly large, and access to
alarm information is quite sensitive, I propose that we define a
smaller subset of the working group, who will have actual access to
*alarm information*. This subgroup will include at least one person
per experiment. All such people agree to respect privacy rules. The
"subgroup" is currently me, Alec, Mark, and one or two people from
LVD, to be designated, and will include other experiment members as
the experiments join. Of course the names of the people in the subgroup
will be public.
What do you think?
Kate.