> At the same time, I want to invite people to consider a MONOPOLE WORKING GROUP
> MEETING for the weekend of 7/8 March 1998 AT GRAN SASSO in order to introduce
> the DSTs to people intesting in carrying out analyses, explain the present
> state of the art regarding platforms at which analysis software is already
> available and define analyses goals.
>
I would like to push to have this meeting at least a day
earlier to coincide with my already arranged travel dates. I can of
course try to reschedule my plans if necessary, but I suspect that at
this point the above proposed date is rather fluid. So if we have a
meeting, how about Friday and Saturday, Mar6-7?
Initial proposed agenda topics: Discussion of Erik's cuts in
the DST production, discussion of support data available (e.g. Erik's
stat files, Lori Gray's calibrations/saturation tests) and what is
needed (e.g. WFD hardware history, streamer tube trigger/wire hit
statistics), and discussion of software available (DREAM, FARFALLA,
Ed Kearns' FORTRAN routines).
> osf etc). The only drawback when it comes to WAVEFORM ANALYSES (only) is that
> ZEBRA FILES AS PRODUCED UNTIL NOW HAVE THE ID=1 and ID=2 WFD BUFFERS
> SPLIT. The only method at this moment that can analyze the WFD data in this
> format is C. Walter's Farfalla based on C++. As of now, I am not aware of any
> FORTRAN-based method that performs WFD buffer recombination on MACRO ZEBRA
> data.
As mentioned in the Memo on the WFD Dream patch written by
Alec Habig and Ed Kearns, it is possible to modify their patch to run
on ZEBRA data. All of the raw data information contained in the RAWR
bank in MACRO raw data is kept around in the RAWE bank for Zebra data,
so in principle the modification is simple.
Cheers,
Chris